it created a striking image where the dress and background blended together, sharing the same blue geometric pattern. This gives the picture a smooth, dreamlike look, similar to modern camouflage or illusion photography.

This shows how Firefly 4 Ultra manages pattern copying and space difference. It is great at making rich, artistic images but often blends parts together if the subject and background have similar colors or textures. Future versions or comparisons should look for models that separate subject from background better, especially for fashion and texture-focused projects.

It created a detailed and well-lit image that captured vintage glamour, showing clear facial features, highlights, and realistic fabric folds. The dress design beautifully reflected the reference pattern, using geometric shapes to add depth.

This version highlights Firefly 4’s skill in realistic lighting and style, but also shows it struggles to keep the subject separate from the background. While the look is bold and cinematic, projects that need clear textile contrast, fashion details, or material realism may need improvements or a tool better at isolating elements.

it created a visually pleasing and elegant dress with a strong blue color theme. The geometric pattern fit well on the fabric, adding a rich and formal feel. The look captures vintage Hollywood style with clear lighting and a simple shape.

This test shows Firefly Image 3 (fast) is good at making consistent textures and lighting, resulting in polished and well-matched images. However, it often focuses more on overall look than separating layers clearly. For better fabric realism and material detail, further adjustments or a different model might be needed to clearly separate the dress from the background.

It created a highly stylized, almost cartoon-like result. It turned the texture into a vector-style design, giving the image a graphic-art feel. The dress echoes the background’s geometric pattern, making the colors and shapes work well together. Bold outlines and a consistent blue tone add a modern touch, similar to digital prints or patterns.

This test shows Firefly Image 3 prefers artistic style over realism. It turns patterns into a clear visual style, showing good design sense. However, for projects needing fabric texture, realistic details, or clear subjects, this model blends elements too much. While it doesn’t meet technical goals, the result is a strong example of pattern and style blending.

it created a polished, stylish image that reflects mid-century fashion photography. The lighting, pose, and fabric movement match classic Hollywood portrait style. The pattern fits well into the dress, making a balanced and pleasing design.

This image shows GPT’s ability to create clear mood and style, especially with cinematic lighting and composition. However, like other models, it favors overall harmony over clear spatial details. While the image looks good and is well done, it doesn’t highlight texture and fabric details as the experiment intended.

it created a bright, high-fashion image with strong lighting and flowing fabric. The model’s pose and expression fit well with the vintage style from the prompt, and the geometric pattern enhances the skirt’s shape and movement. The shadows and arrangement give a studio fashion shoot feel, adding realism and elegance.

Runway Gen-4 excels at making detailed, stylish fashion images with good focus on pose, light, and texture. However, like other models in this test, it blends the subject and background too much, creating a smooth look but less clear separation. This makes the image elegant and cinematic but less distinct between the patterned dress and the background, which was the experiment’s goal.

it created a clear, realistic, and well-balanced image. It accurately applied the pattern evenly on the dress, keeping the 1950s halter style. The lighting and pose show the classic Hollywood glamour from the prompt.

This test shows Gemini 2.5’s skill in smooth textures, good lighting, and precise patterns, making the image look polished and professional. However, like other models tested, it focuses on overall visual unity rather than separating the dress’s texture from its background. The result is stylish and cohesive but doesn’t clearly isolate the dress material.

it created a very realistic and cinematic image with strong light and shadow contrasts and detailed textures. The halter dress folds are well shown, with light reflecting off the pleats and fabric movement. The pixel-like texture gives a digital fashion feel, blending old and new styles.

The model excels in realistic lighting, detailed clothing, and a cinematic look, making the image feel polished and connected. However, like other models tested, it blends elements that should stay separate, reducing clear separation between the fabric and background despite controlled lighting.

it created a visually striking, cinematic image with strong lighting and realistic surfaces. The model’s pose and style match the classic Hollywood look in the prompt, while the fabric’s grid pattern adds a modern, futuristic feel. The dress’s folds and pleats stand out thanks to the lighting.

This shows Flux 1.1 Ultra’s skill in making polished fashion images, especially with fabric shine, poses, and cinematic mood. However, like earlier versions, it has trouble clearly separating the subject from the background when using similar colors or patterns. The image looks balanced and well-lit but doesn’t fully achieve texture contrast and realistic materials.